Being in a great and satisfied
workplace is everyone’s desire. And that’s the reason people look for change.
This fact is known to all and so to HR recruiters. They make use of it in very
intelligent way ...specifically recruiters of a branded/well established
company. When they find a person coming from a startup or SME’s who is perfect
for the job profile, cleared all the interview rounds and just waiting for the
final discussion on CTC, they try to negotiate for the package stating that ‘Your
expected CTC is unreasonable. Your current company is not good compare to ours
in terms of certainty, facility, and security. How can you ask this much?’.
What the ****. You have asked so many relevant/irrelevant question to judge me
in 5/6 rounds, you have tried to pull my leg as much as you can in last 3/4
hours, you have taken advantage of my weaknesses as long as you can and finally
when I have proved myself that I am perfect for your organization, you are
trying to negotiate money stating such reasons??
I really do not understand that if a candidate is really fit for a role, why should recruiters look back from where the candidate is? And most importantly if your organization can’t provide the package asked for, you can simply tell that this is not a range that we provide for your role. Instead, why should you need to underestimate my company? Does it mean that you can provide money, but not to a candidate who comes from SME? I really don’t understand your strategy…
I request that please give value to a candidate who, you think, are absolutely fit for your company irrespective of where they come from and please do not show your attitude as you are HR recruiter. If you think you are a person who has the authority for all recruitment decision, please be humble to selected candidates.
‘Your behavior decides who you are- Anonymous’